<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752670</link>
    <description>Purchase and resale of cargo or container space on a principal-to-principal basis, without agency or promotion of the shipping line&#039;s service, was treated as outside Business Auxiliary Service and not liable to service tax for the disputed period. For the post-01.07.2012 period, export cargo transportation was governed by Rule 10 of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, and the liability alleged in the notice was not sustained. Extended limitation was also held unavailable because the notice lacked specific averments of fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or intent to evade tax, so the related demand, interest and penalties failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 07:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752670</link>
      <description>Purchase and resale of cargo or container space on a principal-to-principal basis, without agency or promotion of the shipping line&#039;s service, was treated as outside Business Auxiliary Service and not liable to service tax for the disputed period. For the post-01.07.2012 period, export cargo transportation was governed by Rule 10 of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, and the liability alleged in the notice was not sustained. Extended limitation was also held unavailable because the notice lacked specific averments of fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or intent to evade tax, so the related demand, interest and penalties failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>