<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36779</link>
    <description>The court determined that the cost of acquisition of assets for capital gains computation should be based on the value as recorded in the firm&#039;s books as of July 1, 1962. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to consider the market value as on July 1, 1962 was found to be incorrect, as the relevant provisions did not support this approach. The court emphasized that the cost of acquisition alone should be considered for computing capital gains, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation. The decision favored the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:01:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36779</link>
      <description>The court determined that the cost of acquisition of assets for capital gains computation should be based on the value as recorded in the firm&#039;s books as of July 1, 1962. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to consider the market value as on July 1, 1962 was found to be incorrect, as the relevant provisions did not support this approach. The court emphasized that the cost of acquisition alone should be considered for computing capital gains, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation. The decision favored the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>