<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1722 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314062</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside the matter to the assessing officer regarding bogus purchases estimation. Following Bombay HC precedent in M Haji Adam Co, the tribunal directed that additions for bogus purchases should be restricted by bringing the gross profit rate on such purchases to the same rate as genuine purchases, rather than the CIT(A)&#039;s 5% reduction approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 06:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1722 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314062</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai set aside the matter to the assessing officer regarding bogus purchases estimation. Following Bombay HC precedent in M Haji Adam Co, the tribunal directed that additions for bogus purchases should be restricted by bringing the gross profit rate on such purchases to the same rate as genuine purchases, rather than the CIT(A)&#039;s 5% reduction approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>