<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314063</link>
    <description>The appeal concerning the penalty under Sec. 271(1)(c) was allowed for statistical purposes. The ITAT remitted the matter to the CIT(A) for further examination, emphasizing the need for specifying the exact head/limb of the penalty. The CIT(A) was instructed to ensure the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing, addressing the jurisdictional challenge and the unspecified limb in the penalty notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 06:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314063</link>
      <description>The appeal concerning the penalty under Sec. 271(1)(c) was allowed for statistical purposes. The ITAT remitted the matter to the CIT(A) for further examination, emphasizing the need for specifying the exact head/limb of the penalty. The CIT(A) was instructed to ensure the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing, addressing the jurisdictional challenge and the unspecified limb in the penalty notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>