<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Order, Rejects Claims of Errors in Assessment Remands Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Legal Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77458</link>
    <description>Review petition - Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court dismissed the review petitions seeking to challenge a common order dated 04.11.2022, which set aside assessment orders but remanded the matters back to the assessing officer. The petitioners argued errors in this remand and the absence of reasons for reopening assessments. However, the court found no merit in these arguments. It held that the circumstances of the case did not align with cited legal precedents and that the failure to furnish reasons did not invalidate the reassessment process due to a recognized technical glitch. Therefore, the court upheld the original order, dismissing the review petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 18:32:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 18:32:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Order, Rejects Claims of Errors in Assessment Remands Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Legal Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77458</link>
      <description>Review petition - Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court dismissed the review petitions seeking to challenge a common order dated 04.11.2022, which set aside assessment orders but remanded the matters back to the assessing officer. The petitioners argued errors in this remand and the absence of reasons for reopening assessments. However, the court found no merit in these arguments. It held that the circumstances of the case did not align with cited legal precedents and that the failure to furnish reasons did not invalidate the reassessment process due to a recognized technical glitch. Therefore, the court upheld the original order, dismissing the review petitions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 18:32:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>