<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 135 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314058</link>
    <description>Millers who merely process third-party paddy may claim exemption from levy obligations only if they satisfy the prescribed disclosure and custody conditions; absent proof of compliance, relief is premature. The Essential Commodities Act was read as authorising regulation of production, manufacture, price control, and compulsory sale of stock to the Government, so a levy order requiring sale of a specified portion of rice at a notified price was held to be within delegated power. The pricing mechanism was also treated as part of price control, because &quot;control&quot; was construed broadly to include price regulation by notification. The levy and procurement scheme therefore remained valid subject to proved exemption conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 14:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 135 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314058</link>
      <description>Millers who merely process third-party paddy may claim exemption from levy obligations only if they satisfy the prescribed disclosure and custody conditions; absent proof of compliance, relief is premature. The Essential Commodities Act was read as authorising regulation of production, manufacture, price control, and compulsory sale of stock to the Government, so a levy order requiring sale of a specified portion of rice at a notified price was held to be within delegated power. The pricing mechanism was also treated as part of price control, because &quot;control&quot; was construed broadly to include price regulation by notification. The levy and procurement scheme therefore remained valid subject to proved exemption conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>