<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1027 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314057</link>
    <description>The SC allowed Civil Appeal No. 1493 of 2000 and Civil Appeal No. 3632 of 2000, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner and CEGAT. In these cases, the imported drawings and designs were deemed not dutiable. Other appeals were dismissed, except for Leela Ventures, where the Commissioner will assess the transaction value for levy imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 11:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1027 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314057</link>
      <description>The SC allowed Civil Appeal No. 1493 of 2000 and Civil Appeal No. 3632 of 2000, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner and CEGAT. In these cases, the imported drawings and designs were deemed not dutiable. Other appeals were dismissed, except for Leela Ventures, where the Commissioner will assess the transaction value for levy imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>