<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 718 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752665</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the penalty orders issued under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, following a search of the petitioner&#039;s premises, ruling them unjustified. The orders dated June 18, 2018, and June 14, 2019, were set aside. The respondents were directed to refund the tax and penalty amounts within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed, granting consequential reliefs to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 21:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 718 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752665</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the penalty orders issued under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, following a search of the petitioner&#039;s premises, ruling them unjustified. The orders dated June 18, 2018, and June 14, 2019, were set aside. The respondents were directed to refund the tax and penalty amounts within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed, granting consequential reliefs to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>