<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752646</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for deduction under section 54 for LTCG. The assessee had entered into an agreement on 25/07/2009 for an under-construction property and received possession on 2/2/2011. The tribunal held that for under-construction properties, the date of possession when the property becomes inhabitable constitutes the date of purchase, not the agreement date. Following precedents including Akshay Sobti and Bastimal K Jain, the tribunal ruled that booking a bare shell constitutes construction, not purchase, and the completion date should be considered for section 54 purposes. The deduction was allowed as the possession date fell within the prescribed one-year window.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752646</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for deduction under section 54 for LTCG. The assessee had entered into an agreement on 25/07/2009 for an under-construction property and received possession on 2/2/2011. The tribunal held that for under-construction properties, the date of possession when the property becomes inhabitable constitutes the date of purchase, not the agreement date. Following precedents including Akshay Sobti and Bastimal K Jain, the tribunal ruled that booking a bare shell constitutes construction, not purchase, and the completion date should be considered for section 54 purposes. The deduction was allowed as the possession date fell within the prescribed one-year window.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>