<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752640</link>
    <description>The ITAT Cochin ruled on capital gains treatment for land sale, focusing on whether land qualified as agricultural based on distance from municipality limits. The tribunal held that distance measurement from agricultural land to Angamally Municipality boundaries must be calculated using longitude and latitude coordinates through multiple points, as municipal limits are non-linear. If any point falls within 2 km, the land loses agricultural exemption. The AO was directed to obtain coordinates from KSREC for precise measurement. For contiguous land, distance should be measured from boundaries; segregated portions require separate assessment. The burden of proof lies with the assessee, though AO can verify and seek expert opinion if disagreeing. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 693 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752640</link>
      <description>The ITAT Cochin ruled on capital gains treatment for land sale, focusing on whether land qualified as agricultural based on distance from municipality limits. The tribunal held that distance measurement from agricultural land to Angamally Municipality boundaries must be calculated using longitude and latitude coordinates through multiple points, as municipal limits are non-linear. If any point falls within 2 km, the land loses agricultural exemption. The AO was directed to obtain coordinates from KSREC for precise measurement. For contiguous land, distance should be measured from boundaries; segregated portions require separate assessment. The burden of proof lies with the assessee, though AO can verify and seek expert opinion if disagreeing. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>