<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for Unmet Export Obligations Overturned Due to Lack of Legal Contravention Under Trade Regulation Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77442</link>
    <description>Levy of Penalty while waiver of customs duty - Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FT Act) - While the rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by BIFR provided for a waiver of customs duty and interest, the penalty was specifically imposed under Section 11(2) of the FT Act for non-fulfillment of export obligations - The court scrutinized the language of Section 11(2) and emphasized that it applies when there is a contravention of the provisions of the FT Act, rules, or foreign trade policy. In this case, the failure to fulfill the export obligation did not amount to a contravention under Section 11(2). As such, the imposition of the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for Unmet Export Obligations Overturned Due to Lack of Legal Contravention Under Trade Regulation Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77442</link>
      <description>Levy of Penalty while waiver of customs duty - Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FT Act) - While the rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by BIFR provided for a waiver of customs duty and interest, the penalty was specifically imposed under Section 11(2) of the FT Act for non-fulfillment of export obligations - The court scrutinized the language of Section 11(2) and emphasized that it applies when there is a contravention of the provisions of the FT Act, rules, or foreign trade policy. In this case, the failure to fulfill the export obligation did not amount to a contravention under Section 11(2). As such, the imposition of the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>