<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Former Director Lacks Standing to Contest Claim; Appeal Dismissed, Costs Imposed for Delaying Resolution Process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77439</link>
    <description>Entitlement to file an appeal as an Independent Director in the Corporate Debtor - The appellant, an erstwhile director of the corporate debtor, challenged the admission of the claim, citing a One Time Settlement (OTS) agreement from 2008. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant lacked the legal standing to challenge the claim admission. It affirmed the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision, which was based on the terms of the OTS and subsequent revocation by the financial creditor. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, imposing a cost on the appellant for what it deemed as an attempt to delay the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Former Director Lacks Standing to Contest Claim; Appeal Dismissed, Costs Imposed for Delaying Resolution Process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77439</link>
      <description>Entitlement to file an appeal as an Independent Director in the Corporate Debtor - The appellant, an erstwhile director of the corporate debtor, challenged the admission of the claim, citing a One Time Settlement (OTS) agreement from 2008. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant lacked the legal standing to challenge the claim admission. It affirmed the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision, which was based on the terms of the OTS and subsequent revocation by the financial creditor. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, imposing a cost on the appellant for what it deemed as an attempt to delay the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:19:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>