<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752620</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed the Look Out Circular (LOC) issued by ED against petitioner in a money laundering case. Petitioner, working in Bahrain since education, appeared before ED seven times from December 2020 after returning to India during COVID-19. Despite ED&#039;s investigation since 2019 and petitioner&#039;s cooperation, no material evidence was found against him. Court held detention cannot be based solely on non-cooperation, especially when petitioner had been deprived of livelihood since December 2020. Given petitioner&#039;s two-decade work history in Middle East and lack of incriminating material, continued detention was inappropriate. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752620</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed the Look Out Circular (LOC) issued by ED against petitioner in a money laundering case. Petitioner, working in Bahrain since education, appeared before ED seven times from December 2020 after returning to India during COVID-19. Despite ED&#039;s investigation since 2019 and petitioner&#039;s cooperation, no material evidence was found against him. Court held detention cannot be based solely on non-cooperation, especially when petitioner had been deprived of livelihood since December 2020. Given petitioner&#039;s two-decade work history in Middle East and lack of incriminating material, continued detention was inappropriate. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>