https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752612 The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Chandigarh, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. It determined that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, applied since the appellant manufactured both exempted and dutiable goods. Consequently, the recovery of central excise duty was not warranted. en-us Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 May 2024 09:18:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752612 The Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Chandigarh, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. It determined that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, applied since the appellant manufactured both exempted and dutiable goods. Consequently, the recovery of central excise duty was not warranted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752612