<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1460 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314055</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed petition seeking quashing of Look Out Circular (LOC) and permission to travel abroad. Petitioner was under investigation by SFIO for allegedly siphoning Rs. 208 crores. Court noted economic offences require different approach due to deep-rooted conspiracies and threat to financial health. Given petitioner lacked roots in country, investigation at crucial stage, and flight risk concerns, HC upheld LOC dated 13.06.2022, finding SFIO&#039;s apprehension of non-return justified under MHA guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 22:38:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1460 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314055</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed petition seeking quashing of Look Out Circular (LOC) and permission to travel abroad. Petitioner was under investigation by SFIO for allegedly siphoning Rs. 208 crores. Court noted economic offences require different approach due to deep-rooted conspiracies and threat to financial health. Given petitioner lacked roots in country, investigation at crucial stage, and flight risk concerns, HC upheld LOC dated 13.06.2022, finding SFIO&#039;s apprehension of non-return justified under MHA guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>