<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 659 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752606</link>
    <description>The HC of Karnataka upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, concluding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for developing a software platform should be treated as revenue in nature. The court agreed that the abandonment of the project due to technological changes meant there was no enduring benefit, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 659 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752606</link>
      <description>The HC of Karnataka upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, concluding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for developing a software platform should be treated as revenue in nature. The court agreed that the abandonment of the project due to technological changes meant there was no enduring benefit, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>