https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314046 The MP HC allowed anticipatory bail in a rape case based on false marriage promise. The court noted that both parties were mature individuals who lived together after developing physical intimacy and later married, though the complainant alleged the accused was already married. Bank transactions showed their proximity, and both had previously attempted settlement under Section 482 CrPC. The court emphasized that consensual intimacy cannot be weaponized for vengeance when relationships deteriorate, ruling that personal liberty under Section 438 CrPC embodies Article 21 constitutional protections. en-us Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 May 2024 19:14:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314046 The MP HC allowed anticipatory bail in a rape case based on false marriage promise. The court noted that both parties were mature individuals who lived together after developing physical intimacy and later married, though the complainant alleged the accused was already married. Bank transactions showed their proximity, and both had previously attempted settlement under Section 482 CrPC. The court emphasized that consensual intimacy cannot be weaponized for vengeance when relationships deteriorate, ruling that personal liberty under Section 438 CrPC embodies Article 21 constitutional protections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314046