<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1384 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314047</link>
    <description>The HC granted anticipatory bail to a proclaimed offender in a rape case. The Court held that Section 82 CrPC does not restrict proclaimed offenders from filing anticipatory bail applications. Analyzing the allegations, the Court found the accused may have left the area before FIR registration due to emotional distress. The victim&#039;s conduct of accompanying the accused to her bedroom without resistance and subsequently fleeing to stay alone in a cave for three days supported granting bail. The Court balanced stakeholder interests and determined further incarceration would not serve any significant purpose. Petition was allowed with appropriate conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 19:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1384 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314047</link>
      <description>The HC granted anticipatory bail to a proclaimed offender in a rape case. The Court held that Section 82 CrPC does not restrict proclaimed offenders from filing anticipatory bail applications. Analyzing the allegations, the Court found the accused may have left the area before FIR registration due to emotional distress. The victim&#039;s conduct of accompanying the accused to her bedroom without resistance and subsequently fleeing to stay alone in a cave for three days supported granting bail. The Court balanced stakeholder interests and determined further incarceration would not serve any significant purpose. Petition was allowed with appropriate conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>