<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RECOVERING GST PAID AT HIGHER RATE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119111</link>
    <description>Buyer paid GST charged erroneously on a nil-rated product, availed ITC, and later paid a departmental demand; practitioners advise filing a refund claim against the government on the ground that the tax was never payable in law and limitation should not bar relief, or alternatively reversing ITC and seeking refund, while recovery from the supplier may be contested and likely requires litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 18:30:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RECOVERING GST PAID AT HIGHER RATE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119111</link>
      <description>Buyer paid GST charged erroneously on a nil-rated product, availed ITC, and later paid a departmental demand; practitioners advise filing a refund claim against the government on the ground that the tax was never payable in law and limitation should not bar relief, or alternatively reversing ITC and seeking refund, while recovery from the supplier may be contested and likely requires litigation.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 18:30:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>