<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36764</link>
    <description>The minor partner attained majority during the accounting year, but the fresh partnership deed was executed only after year-end. Until the close of that year, the statutory period for the former minor to exercise the option had not expired, so no change in the constitution of the firm had taken effect during the relevant accounting year. Continuance of registration was therefore available to the assessee-firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36764</link>
      <description>The minor partner attained majority during the accounting year, but the fresh partnership deed was executed only after year-end. Until the close of that year, the statutory period for the former minor to exercise the option had not expired, so no change in the constitution of the firm had taken effect during the relevant accounting year. Continuance of registration was therefore available to the assessee-firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>