<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 222 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314035</link>
    <description>The HC of Andhra Pradesh dismissed three tax revision cases. It clarified that simultaneity in penalty and reassessment orders does not require the same date. The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on a turnover totaling mistake, affirming the penalty due to the wilful nature of the conduct involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 14:46:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 222 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314035</link>
      <description>The HC of Andhra Pradesh dismissed three tax revision cases. It clarified that simultaneity in penalty and reassessment orders does not require the same date. The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on a turnover totaling mistake, affirming the penalty due to the wilful nature of the conduct involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>