https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314034 A person in judicial custody may be shifted to police custody where sufficient grounds exist and the remand request falls within the permissible custody period. The extended remand under Section 20 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 enlarged the period under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the custody order was valid because it was made within that time. The Court also accepted safeguards against ill-treatment, including access to counsel and medical examination if maltreatment was suspected. The custody transfer was upheld, subject to these protective conditions. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 May 2024 14:31:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314034 A person in judicial custody may be shifted to police custody where sufficient grounds exist and the remand request falls within the permissible custody period. The extended remand under Section 20 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 enlarged the period under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the custody order was valid because it was made within that time. The Court also accepted safeguards against ill-treatment, including access to counsel and medical examination if maltreatment was suspected. The custody transfer was upheld, subject to these protective conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314034