<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1325 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314033</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the investment in plant and machinery, including Modvat incentives, should be included in the fixed capital investment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The court also held that the statutory requirement for car parking should be considered part of the fixed capital investment, reversing the tribunal&#039;s disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 13:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1325 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314033</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the investment in plant and machinery, including Modvat incentives, should be included in the fixed capital investment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The court also held that the statutory requirement for car parking should be considered part of the fixed capital investment, reversing the tribunal&#039;s disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>