<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order Invalidated for Ignoring Responses; Court Directs Fair Hearing and New Order for Objective Adjudication.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77413</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment order - The court noted that the audit observations were indeed converted into the show cause notice and subsequently into the impugned order without substantial evaluation of the petitioner&#039;s responses. This approach violated the principles of natural justice as laid out in the ORYX Fisheries case, where meaningful opportunity to respond is imperative. - The court found that the identical language used in both the show cause notice and the impugned order substantiated the petitioner&#039;s claim of predetermination. This negated the objective adjudication process required by law. - The court ordered that the impugned order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner a fresh opportunity to respond, and directed the authorities to issue a new order after a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order Invalidated for Ignoring Responses; Court Directs Fair Hearing and New Order for Objective Adjudication.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77413</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment order - The court noted that the audit observations were indeed converted into the show cause notice and subsequently into the impugned order without substantial evaluation of the petitioner&#039;s responses. This approach violated the principles of natural justice as laid out in the ORYX Fisheries case, where meaningful opportunity to respond is imperative. - The court found that the identical language used in both the show cause notice and the impugned order substantiated the petitioner&#039;s claim of predetermination. This negated the objective adjudication process required by law. - The court ordered that the impugned order be treated as a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner a fresh opportunity to respond, and directed the authorities to issue a new order after a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:55:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>