<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 651 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752598</link>
    <description>A purported bogus sauda chitthi relating to an immovable property purchase at Surat raised the question whether a mere allegation of advance payment, without transfer of the property, could justify reopening on the basis of escapement of income. The Gujarat HC held that such allegation, without specific and sufficient material, did not show prima facie escapement for the relevant year. The Special Leave Petition was later dismissed for delay, with no justifiable grounds for condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 651 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752598</link>
      <description>A purported bogus sauda chitthi relating to an immovable property purchase at Surat raised the question whether a mere allegation of advance payment, without transfer of the property, could justify reopening on the basis of escapement of income. The Gujarat HC held that such allegation, without specific and sufficient material, did not show prima facie escapement for the relevant year. The Special Leave Petition was later dismissed for delay, with no justifiable grounds for condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>