<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 647 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752594</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed notices issued under section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers (JAO) in faceless assessment cases, ruling they should have been issued by Faceless Assessing Officers (FAO) only. Following the precedent in Hexaware Technologies Limited, the court held such notices invalid under the scheme framed under section 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. All consequential reassessment orders, demand notices, and penalty notices were also quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 647 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752594</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed notices issued under section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers (JAO) in faceless assessment cases, ruling they should have been issued by Faceless Assessing Officers (FAO) only. Following the precedent in Hexaware Technologies Limited, the court held such notices invalid under the scheme framed under section 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. All consequential reassessment orders, demand notices, and penalty notices were also quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>