<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Invalidates Late Tax Reassessment on Cyprus NCDs, Citing Change of Opinion &amp; India-Cyprus DTAA Misinterpretation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77427</link>
    <description>Reopening of Assessment u/s 147 - investment in NCDs unexplained - difference between accrual of income and receipt of income - reopening after the expiry of four years - Petitioner is a tax resident of Cyprus - The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening notice dated 30th March 2021 and subsequent orders, holding that the reopening of the assessment was based on a mere change of opinion, which is not a valid ground for reassessment. The Court emphasized that all material facts were disclosed by the Petitioner during the original assessment proceedings, and any reassessment after four years is impermissible without a failure to disclose such facts. Furthermore, the Court upheld the Petitioner&#039;s argument that under the India-Cyprus DTAA, interest income is taxable only upon receipt, which was not adequately addressed by the Respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:54:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Invalidates Late Tax Reassessment on Cyprus NCDs, Citing Change of Opinion &amp; India-Cyprus DTAA Misinterpretation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77427</link>
      <description>Reopening of Assessment u/s 147 - investment in NCDs unexplained - difference between accrual of income and receipt of income - reopening after the expiry of four years - Petitioner is a tax resident of Cyprus - The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening notice dated 30th March 2021 and subsequent orders, holding that the reopening of the assessment was based on a mere change of opinion, which is not a valid ground for reassessment. The Court emphasized that all material facts were disclosed by the Petitioner during the original assessment proceedings, and any reassessment after four years is impermissible without a failure to disclose such facts. Furthermore, the Court upheld the Petitioner&#039;s argument that under the India-Cyprus DTAA, interest income is taxable only upon receipt, which was not adequately addressed by the Respondents.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 06:54:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>