<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 613 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752560</link>
    <description>A cheque dishonour conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld because the cheque was issued towards an existing legal liability, the defence failed to rebut that liability, and the demand notice was duly served. On sentence, the Court emphasised that cheque dishonour matters are primarily concerned with recovery of the due, and modified the custodial punishment on the facts. The monetary direction was also reworked within the sentencing framework by substituting the term compensation with fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 613 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752560</link>
      <description>A cheque dishonour conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld because the cheque was issued towards an existing legal liability, the defence failed to rebut that liability, and the demand notice was duly served. On sentence, the Court emphasised that cheque dishonour matters are primarily concerned with recovery of the due, and modified the custodial punishment on the facts. The monetary direction was also reworked within the sentencing framework by substituting the term compensation with fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>