https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314014 HC considered a petition challenging an LOC and seeking permission to travel to the U.K. for medical treatment. The record and statements made by the petitioner indicated non-cooperation with the SFIO investigation. HC held that, in view of such non-cooperation, no interference with the LOC was warranted at this stage and declined permission to travel abroad. However, HC observed that if the petitioner fully cooperates with the SFIO over the ensuing two months, the request for travel and modification of the LOC may be reconsidered on the next listing date. en-us Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314014 HC considered a petition challenging an LOC and seeking permission to travel to the U.K. for medical treatment. The record and statements made by the petitioner indicated non-cooperation with the SFIO investigation. HC held that, in view of such non-cooperation, no interference with the LOC was warranted at this stage and declined permission to travel abroad. However, HC observed that if the petitioner fully cooperates with the SFIO over the ensuing two months, the request for travel and modification of the LOC may be reconsidered on the next listing date. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314014