<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Penalty Proceedings for TDS Defaults on External Development Charges Due to Legal Ambiguity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77392</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271C - failure to deduct TDS u/s 194C on External Development Charges - The High court noted that the applicability of Section 194C had been explicitly raised in counter-affidavits, providing sufficient notice to the petitioners. Therefore, the court declined to interfere with the show-cause notices at this stage. - Regarding the treatment of the petitioners as an assessee-in-default and the imposition of penalties u/s 221 and 271C of the Act, the court observed that such penalties were not inevitable consequences of default. - In this case, the court found that there was a genuine and bona fide legal issue surrounding the applicability of Section 194C to the supplementary commission. Therefore, the court quashed the penalty proceedings under Section 271C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 17:03:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 17:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Penalty Proceedings for TDS Defaults on External Development Charges Due to Legal Ambiguity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77392</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271C - failure to deduct TDS u/s 194C on External Development Charges - The High court noted that the applicability of Section 194C had been explicitly raised in counter-affidavits, providing sufficient notice to the petitioners. Therefore, the court declined to interfere with the show-cause notices at this stage. - Regarding the treatment of the petitioners as an assessee-in-default and the imposition of penalties u/s 221 and 271C of the Act, the court observed that such penalties were not inevitable consequences of default. - In this case, the court found that there was a genuine and bona fide legal issue surrounding the applicability of Section 194C to the supplementary commission. Therefore, the court quashed the penalty proceedings under Section 271C.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 17:03:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>