<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36746</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for dual deductions of interest on mortgage under both &#039;Property&#039; and &#039;Business&#039; heads, confirmed the taxability of interest income debited to the debtor&#039;s account, disallowed the balance of municipal taxes under the business head, and ruled that interim dividends declared by the board should be considered for rebate withdrawal. The court emphasized the mutual exclusiveness of income heads and answered the issues accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 43 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36746</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for dual deductions of interest on mortgage under both &#039;Property&#039; and &#039;Business&#039; heads, confirmed the taxability of interest income debited to the debtor&#039;s account, disallowed the balance of municipal taxes under the business head, and ruled that interim dividends declared by the board should be considered for rebate withdrawal. The court emphasized the mutual exclusiveness of income heads and answered the issues accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>