<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 9 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36745</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the burden of proving the absence of fraud or wilful neglect lay with the assessee, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a factual assessment of the evidence presented. As no question of law arose, the Court rejected the application, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 9 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36745</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the burden of proving the absence of fraud or wilful neglect lay with the assessee, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a factual assessment of the evidence presented. As no question of law arose, the Court rejected the application, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>