<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 605 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752552</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC quashed penalty orders imposed for E-Way bill violations, ruling that authorities failed to provide hearing opportunity, violating natural justice principles. The court found no mens rea for tax evasion since the E-Way bill was downloaded before vehicle interception and matched the goods/invoice. The court emphasized that technical violations without intent to evade tax and minor documentation errors cannot justify penalty imposition. Authorities failed to verify the E-Way bill&#039;s genuineness from GST portal and denied proper hearing, acting contrary to law. The petition was allowed and impugned orders set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 605 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752552</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC quashed penalty orders imposed for E-Way bill violations, ruling that authorities failed to provide hearing opportunity, violating natural justice principles. The court found no mens rea for tax evasion since the E-Way bill was downloaded before vehicle interception and matched the goods/invoice. The court emphasized that technical violations without intent to evade tax and minor documentation errors cannot justify penalty imposition. Authorities failed to verify the E-Way bill&#039;s genuineness from GST portal and denied proper hearing, acting contrary to law. The petition was allowed and impugned orders set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>