<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 595 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752542</link>
    <description>The HC condoned the delay in filing the income return, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. It set aside the CBDT&#039;s rejection of the condonation application under Section 119(2)(b) and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh assessment, directing consideration of the Section 80IB deduction claim without delay implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 595 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752542</link>
      <description>The HC condoned the delay in filing the income return, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. It set aside the CBDT&#039;s rejection of the condonation application under Section 119(2)(b) and quashed the assessment order. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh assessment, directing consideration of the Section 80IB deduction claim without delay implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>