<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752535</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. This decision was based on additional evidence submitted by the assessee, which was not previously considered. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the Rs 1,71,63,460/- addition due to mismatched receipts in light of this new evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 08:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 588 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752535</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. This decision was based on additional evidence submitted by the assessee, which was not previously considered. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the Rs 1,71,63,460/- addition due to mismatched receipts in light of this new evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>