<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752527</link>
    <description>Reinsurance and retrocession receipts were held not taxable in India because the DRP had already accepted the assessee&#039;s position on identical facts in a sister concern&#039;s case, and that finding bound the Assessing Officer under section 144C(13); the competing arguments on business connection, fixed place, service or agency permanent establishment, and profit attribution were therefore academic. Service fees from Indian group entities were also held outside the treaty fee for technical services clause because the services did not make available technical knowledge, skill, experience or know-how enabling independent future use by the recipients. The additions on both counts were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752527</link>
      <description>Reinsurance and retrocession receipts were held not taxable in India because the DRP had already accepted the assessee&#039;s position on identical facts in a sister concern&#039;s case, and that finding bound the Assessing Officer under section 144C(13); the competing arguments on business connection, fixed place, service or agency permanent establishment, and profit attribution were therefore academic. Service fees from Indian group entities were also held outside the treaty fee for technical services clause because the services did not make available technical knowledge, skill, experience or know-how enabling independent future use by the recipients. The additions on both counts were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>