<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 78 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36740</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that penalty proceedings under the W.T. Act could not be continued against the legal representative after the death of the original assessee. It was clarified that the legal representative is not liable for penalties arising from defaults committed by the deceased, as per sections 18 and 19(3) of the Act. Additionally, the court deemed the penalty proceedings invalid due to the absence of specific notice to the legal representative. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 78 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36740</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that penalty proceedings under the W.T. Act could not be continued against the legal representative after the death of the original assessee. It was clarified that the legal representative is not liable for penalties arising from defaults committed by the deceased, as per sections 18 and 19(3) of the Act. Additionally, the court deemed the penalty proceedings invalid due to the absence of specific notice to the legal representative. The assessee was awarded costs amounting to Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>