<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313993</link>
    <description>Bail under a special statute cannot be granted on extraneous considerations such as political status or presumed conduct; the court must apply the statutory restriction, examine the investigation material, and record reasons showing reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not involved in the offence. The Supreme Court held that the impugned bail order was unsustainable because it ignored witness statements and other case-diary material, and failed to apply the settled factors relevant to serious offences, including the nature of the accusation, the evidence collected, and the risk of interference with witnesses or the trial. The bail was cancelled and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 10:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 329 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313993</link>
      <description>Bail under a special statute cannot be granted on extraneous considerations such as political status or presumed conduct; the court must apply the statutory restriction, examine the investigation material, and record reasons showing reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not involved in the offence. The Supreme Court held that the impugned bail order was unsustainable because it ignored witness statements and other case-diary material, and failed to apply the settled factors relevant to serious offences, including the nature of the accusation, the evidence collected, and the risk of interference with witnesses or the trial. The bail was cancelled and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>