<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>INVESTMENTS FROM NRE ACCOUNT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12600</link>
    <description>The High Court found that investments funded from NRE accounts are exempt from inclusion in total income under Section 10(4), and that notices issued under Section 148/Section 148A were not appropriate where documentary evidence (NRE account statements and certificate of residence) demonstrated the foreign-sourced, repatriable character of the funds; the ruling underscores the evidentiary value of bank records and residence proof in assessing jurisdiction to reopen assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 09:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 09:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>INVESTMENTS FROM NRE ACCOUNT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12600</link>
      <description>The High Court found that investments funded from NRE accounts are exempt from inclusion in total income under Section 10(4), and that notices issued under Section 148/Section 148A were not appropriate where documentary evidence (NRE account statements and certificate of residence) demonstrated the foreign-sourced, repatriable character of the funds; the ruling underscores the evidentiary value of bank records and residence proof in assessing jurisdiction to reopen assessments.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 09:45:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>