<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 551 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752498</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the tax demand order against the petitioner, finding the Proper Officer did not adequately consider the detailed reply. The SC remitted the Show Cause Notice for re-adjudication, directing the officer to examine the ITC TRAN-I reversal claim, provide a personal hearing, and pass a fresh order within the prescribed period. All parties&#039; rights were reserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 551 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752498</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the tax demand order against the petitioner, finding the Proper Officer did not adequately consider the detailed reply. The SC remitted the Show Cause Notice for re-adjudication, directing the officer to examine the ITC TRAN-I reversal claim, provide a personal hearing, and pass a fresh order within the prescribed period. All parties&#039; rights were reserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>