<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 542 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752489</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that failure to issue notice under section 143(2) before making additions constituted a jurisdictional error that rendered the assessment unsustainable. The Revenue argued no notice was required, but the tribunal ruled that proper notice must be served before additions can be made. Following Supreme Court precedent in Hotel Blue Moon case, the tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, finding the procedural violation fatal to the Revenue&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 08:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 542 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752489</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that failure to issue notice under section 143(2) before making additions constituted a jurisdictional error that rendered the assessment unsustainable. The Revenue argued no notice was required, but the tribunal ruled that proper notice must be served before additions can be made. Following Supreme Court precedent in Hotel Blue Moon case, the tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, finding the procedural violation fatal to the Revenue&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>