<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1404 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313983</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in a case involving addition under Section 68 for large share premium received. The assessee&#039;s delay in filing appeal was condoned as their tax consultant failed to communicate CIT(A)&#039;s notices and order. Both AO and CIT(A) orders lacked proper application of mind - AO&#039;s assessment was incoherent with computational errors, while CIT(A) merely reproduced readymade material without addressing key issues like identity of share applicants and amounts received. ITAT found factual investigation incomplete and remanded the matter to AO for fresh adjudication, setting aside both lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 08:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1404 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313983</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes in a case involving addition under Section 68 for large share premium received. The assessee&#039;s delay in filing appeal was condoned as their tax consultant failed to communicate CIT(A)&#039;s notices and order. Both AO and CIT(A) orders lacked proper application of mind - AO&#039;s assessment was incoherent with computational errors, while CIT(A) merely reproduced readymade material without addressing key issues like identity of share applicants and amounts received. ITAT found factual investigation incomplete and remanded the matter to AO for fresh adjudication, setting aside both lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>