https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313986 The right to travel abroad was treated as part of personal liberty under Article 21, but lookout circulars were held to be validly issued without prior notice where their purpose is to secure a person's presence for investigation or trial. Fairness, however, requires that when the person is intercepted and travel is stopped, he be informed of the restraint and supplied with the lookout circular then, as a post-decisional opportunity satisfies the minimum requirement of natural justice. On the facts, because the criminal case remained pending and had not been stayed or quashed, a direct recall of the lookout circular was not warranted; the matter was confined to consideration of the representation in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2024 08:33:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313986 The right to travel abroad was treated as part of personal liberty under Article 21, but lookout circulars were held to be validly issued without prior notice where their purpose is to secure a person's presence for investigation or trial. Fairness, however, requires that when the person is intercepted and travel is stopped, he be informed of the restraint and supplied with the lookout circular then, as a post-decisional opportunity satisfies the minimum requirement of natural justice. On the facts, because the criminal case remained pending and had not been stayed or quashed, a direct recall of the lookout circular was not warranted; the matter was confined to consideration of the representation in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313986