<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 76 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36729</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether, on the valuation date, administration of a deceased&#039;s estate had been completed so that the estate value was assessable separately in the executor&#039;s hands under section 19A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court noted that an executor&#039;s assent to vesting in legatees may be express or implied and can be inferred from conduct once administration has reached a stage of ripeness. It also observed that the will indicated an intention that the properties be enjoyed as joint family properties, but the Tribunal had not examined the crucial factual question whether the executor had assented during the period between death and the valuation date. The reference was returned unanswered and remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 76 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36729</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether, on the valuation date, administration of a deceased&#039;s estate had been completed so that the estate value was assessable separately in the executor&#039;s hands under section 19A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court noted that an executor&#039;s assent to vesting in legatees may be express or implied and can be inferred from conduct once administration has reached a stage of ripeness. It also observed that the will indicated an intention that the properties be enjoyed as joint family properties, but the Tribunal had not examined the crucial factual question whether the executor had assented during the period between death and the valuation date. The reference was returned unanswered and remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>