<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Show-cause notice flaw: No hearing scheduled despite adverse decision risk; hearing required by law u/s 75(4).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77336</link>
    <description>Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observed that while the show-cause notice provided details for a personal hearing, including the date, time, and venue, the abbreviation &#039;N.A.&#039; indicated that no such hearing was actually scheduled. The court referred to Section 75(4) of the said Act, emphasizing that an opportunity of hearing must be provided before reaching a decision under Section 73. It noted that since an adverse decision was anticipated against the petitioners, the proper officer was duty-bound to grant them a hearing, regardless of the absence of a written request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:35:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Show-cause notice flaw: No hearing scheduled despite adverse decision risk; hearing required by law u/s 75(4).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77336</link>
      <description>Violation of principles of natural justice - The court observed that while the show-cause notice provided details for a personal hearing, including the date, time, and venue, the abbreviation &#039;N.A.&#039; indicated that no such hearing was actually scheduled. The court referred to Section 75(4) of the said Act, emphasizing that an opportunity of hearing must be provided before reaching a decision under Section 73. It noted that since an adverse decision was anticipated against the petitioners, the proper officer was duty-bound to grant them a hearing, regardless of the absence of a written request.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:35:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>