Mohit Agarwal Vs. CIT (All)- Appeal of assesse was earlier admitted then at the time of further hearing dismissed as based on facts and meritless involving no substantial question of law order is not as per S. 260A and binding precedence and law declared by the Supreme Court.Apparent carelessness in typing of order- judges also need to be careful.

Mohit Agarwal Vs. CIT (All)- Appeal of assesse was earlier admitted then at the time of further hearing dismissed as based on facts and meritless involving no substantial question of law order is not as per S. 260A and binding precedence and law declared by the Supreme Court.Apparent carelessness in typing of order- judges also need to be careful. https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12599 The High Court heard and dismissed an admitted income-tax appeal without formally framing the Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A, omitted reproduction of Tribunal records and the questions urged in the memorandum, and contained typographical errors in counsel identification; these procedural deficiencies depart from Section 260A sequencing and binding precedent and may justify recall, remand for framing of questions, or further appellate review. en-us Fri, 10 May 2024 10:49:46 +0530 Fri, 10 May 2024 10:49:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator Mohit Agarwal Vs. CIT (All)- Appeal of assesse was earlier admitted then at the time of further hearing dismissed as based on facts and meritless involving no substantial question of law order is not as per S. 260A and binding precedence and law declared by the Supreme Court.Apparent carelessness in typing of order- judges also need to be careful. https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12599 The High Court heard and dismissed an admitted income-tax appeal without formally framing the Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A, omitted reproduction of Tribunal records and the questions urged in the memorandum, and contained typographical errors in counsel identification; these procedural deficiencies depart from Section 260A sequencing and binding precedent and may justify recall, remand for framing of questions, or further appellate review. Articles Income Tax Fri, 10 May 2024 10:49:46 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12599