<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 507 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752454</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the assessment order dated 27.03.2024, citing a fundamental error due to discrepancies between the show cause notice and the assessment order. The Court ruled that territorial jurisdiction was valid in Uttar Pradesh, rejecting the revenue&#039;s objection. The petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a final reply and attend a personal hearing, emphasizing the need for rectifying assessment process errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 06:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 507 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752454</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the assessment order dated 27.03.2024, citing a fundamental error due to discrepancies between the show cause notice and the assessment order. The Court ruled that territorial jurisdiction was valid in Uttar Pradesh, rejecting the revenue&#039;s objection. The petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a final reply and attend a personal hearing, emphasizing the need for rectifying assessment process errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>