https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752446 The HC granted an interim stay on the enforcement of tax demands for the years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12, after the petitioner deposited 20% of the demand. The Court directed authorities not to enforce the demand and allowed the petitioner to seek a refund of the deposited amount. The Court emphasized that the petitioner's appeals should be considered in light of a Division Bench's decision regarding the taxability of amounts received from M/s. Vodafone Idea Limited. The respondents were restrained from taking coercive measures until the appeals are resolved, ensuring a fair review of the assessment orders. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2024 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752446 The HC granted an interim stay on the enforcement of tax demands for the years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12, after the petitioner deposited 20% of the demand. The Court directed authorities not to enforce the demand and allowed the petitioner to seek a refund of the deposited amount. The Court emphasized that the petitioner's appeals should be considered in light of a Division Bench's decision regarding the taxability of amounts received from M/s. Vodafone Idea Limited. The respondents were restrained from taking coercive measures until the appeals are resolved, ensuring a fair review of the assessment orders. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752446