<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752428</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 80IB deduction for real estate development income. The tribunal held that additional income from on-money received during property sales from the Rushikesh project was eligible for Section 80IB deduction as it constituted income from eligible business activity. Regarding unexplained cash credits under Section 68, ITAT ruled that disputed land transactions should be taxed in AY 2009-10 when land was brought into books, not in AY 2008-09. The tribunal emphasized that only the right person can be taxed on right income in correct assessment year, citing Supreme Court precedent. Addition made by AO was deleted as amounts were incorrectly attributed to wrong assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752428</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 80IB deduction for real estate development income. The tribunal held that additional income from on-money received during property sales from the Rushikesh project was eligible for Section 80IB deduction as it constituted income from eligible business activity. Regarding unexplained cash credits under Section 68, ITAT ruled that disputed land transactions should be taxed in AY 2009-10 when land was brought into books, not in AY 2008-09. The tribunal emphasized that only the right person can be taxed on right income in correct assessment year, citing Supreme Court precedent. Addition made by AO was deleted as amounts were incorrectly attributed to wrong assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>