<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36717</link>
    <description>For a fully tenanted, rent-controlled property, market value should ordinarily be assessed on the yield or rental method because the existing statutory rent restriction materially governs the property&#039;s value. A land-and-building valuation with assumed reversionary value was rejected as speculative, since it effectively treated the land twice and ignored the continuing tenancy structure. Comparable sales of vacant land were found unsuitable for an old, wholly let property subject to rent control. The analysis confirms that valuation must reflect actual controlled rental income where rent is stable and unlikely to change, and not an unreal future reversionary possibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36717</link>
      <description>For a fully tenanted, rent-controlled property, market value should ordinarily be assessed on the yield or rental method because the existing statutory rent restriction materially governs the property&#039;s value. A land-and-building valuation with assumed reversionary value was rejected as speculative, since it effectively treated the land twice and ignored the continuing tenancy structure. Comparable sales of vacant land were found unsuitable for an old, wholly let property subject to rent control. The analysis confirms that valuation must reflect actual controlled rental income where rent is stable and unlikely to change, and not an unreal future reversionary possibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>